School Improvement Plan
What is a School Improvement Plan?
A School Improvement Plan (SIP) is a strategic blueprint that schools use to enhance student learning and improve educational practices. It outlines specific goals for improvement, actions to achieve those goals, and methods for measuring progress.
Key Points of a SIP:
- Goals: Clear objectives the school aims to achieve to enhance student outcomes.
- Actions: Steps and strategies the school will implement to reach its goals, based on research and effective practices.
- Monitoring: Regular review of progress with adjustments made to ensure the school stays on track toward its improvement objectives.
The purpose of a SIP is to provide a clear roadmap for schools to improve educational outcomes for all students, particularly focusing on eliminating disparities and ensuring equitable opportunities for every student.
Every school in Washington State is required to have a School Improvement Plan.
Visit the Issaquah School District SIP website to learn more about SIPs.
District - School Improvement Plans

Echo Glen
School Improvement Plan
2024-2026
OSPI School Improvement Plan 2024–2025
Step-by-Step School Improvement Planning and Implementation Guide
Note: For schools operating a Title I, Part A, Targeted Assistance and Schoolwide Program, please use the Consolidated School Improvement Template to satisfy the appropriate Components.
Building data
Please provide your school district and building name below.
- School District: Issaquah School District
- Building Name: Echo Glen School
- School Code: Click or tap here to enter text.
- Date: August 30th, 2024
- Does your school share a building with another school? Yes ☐ No ☒
- If yes, which one? (Please note each school with a school code must submit a separate School Improvement Plan) Click or tap here to enter text.
School Leadership Team Members and Parent-Community Partners
Please list by (Name, Title/Role)
- Allison Ilgenfritz, Principal, ISD
- Lindsay Myatich, Dean of Students, ISD
- Aleece Young, Counselor, ISD
- Cathryn Hawken, Teacher, ISD
- Natalie Harris, Teacher, ISD
- Hold for Tribal Representative.
WSIF Cycle Identification and Report Card Data
Please use the 2023 WSIF Cycle 3 data from the Washington State Report Card to complete the table below. School Improvement Plans for schools identified for tiered support under WSIF are required to align their goals with their WSIF Cycle Identification. The data included in the table below will help align the focus on the Comprehensive Needs Assessment, SMARTIE Goals, and evidence-based practices used in this plan.
Use the 2023 Washington School Improvement Report Card Data to identify and maintain focus on student groups and SMARTIE Goals.
2023 WSIF Cycle Identification
Tier 3 Plus Comprehensive
WSIF Data Measures
2023 WSIF Identification Score (indicate Not Applicable with N/A)
- Comprehensive (All Student Group): 69 Students on Report Card, Actual number of students served: 294
- Comprehensive Graduation Rate: Less than 25.0%
Student Group
- American Indian/Alaska Native 2.9%
- Asian 0.0%
- Black/African American 18.8%
- Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 2.9%
- Hispanic/Latino 34.8%
- Two or more races 10.1 %
- White 31.4%
- English Learner 13.0%
- Low Income 97.1%
- Special Education 34.8%
Summary of Comprehensive Needs Assessment (CNA):
A Comprehensive Needs Assessment (CNA) is required of all schools identified for improvement under the Washington School Improvement Framework. In this section, please summarize data and information gathered from conducting your CNA including all relevant areas of the WSIF (Academic Achievement (ELA and Math Proficiency), Other Academic Achievement (Student Growth Percentile), Graduation Rate, (4-Year Adjusted Cohort) (if applicable), School Quality and Student Success SQSS (Regular Attendance, Ninth Grade on Track, Dual Credit) (if applicable), English Learner Progress).
|
What areas of strength has your team identified through the needs assessment process? What data supported them and how can they be leveraged for areas of improvement? The Issaquah School District team at Echo Glen School are very strong in data collection, reflection and making data based decisions on action plans. In the 23-24 school year, the team identified that school attendance was not at the percentage that the team was happy with. After reviewing data and meeting with our DCYF partners, the team increased school attendance from a 40% average to an attendance rate of 74.76% on the last day of school. The team has invested many hours of Professional Development and funds on a behavior data house (SWIS). This has allowed us to best track data on behavior (both positive and negative) and make data based decisions on where to direct resources and intervention match. It was found that our behavior data shows highly disproportional discipline towards Native and Hispanic students. Please see the attached behavioral data from SWIS. |
|
Describe resource inequities (funding, staffing, materials, resources, etc.) identified through conducting the Comprehensive Needs Assessment that will be addressed in this plan. Echo Glen School continues to be underfunded in FTE to provide the CORE 24 credits toward graduation. For this school year, the team was able to hire Art, Physical Education, Math and Multi-Language Learner certificated teachers to serve our students. . |
|
What possible root causes has your team identified to account for these inequities, especially disproportionalities among student groups? The funding model provided by OSPI is not adequate to serve the students crediting needs at Echo Glen School. Until there are certified teachers to teach areas in foreign language and additional CTE courses, we will not be fully providing the students basic levels of the educational needs. The Issaquah School District does not have access to basic student information at this time. A data share agreement must be had between the Issaquah School District and DCYF. This is paramount to the students and staff’s safety while on the school campus. |
|
Describe the highest priority focus areas for improvement (funding, staffing, materials, resources, etc.) identified through WSIF data and by conducting the Comprehensive Needs Assessment that will be addressed in this plan. Establishing a data share agreement as well as a funding model that is reflective of what the comprehensive schools receive is important. Along with data sharing, access to engage families and community members throughout the state is greatly important to the successful transition from incarceration back to the home community. Monetary investment in parenting courses and access to data is greatly needed to support the work. |
2024-25 School Improvement Plan
Using the guiding questions and tables below, identify your highest priority continuous school improvement goals that you plan to accomplish through evidence-based practices (interventions, activities, or strategies) for SY 2024–25. These goals should be based off WSIF and additional school-level data compiled in your Comprehensive Needs Assessment and evaluation and identification of resource inequities. Please refer to the Step-by-Step School Improvement Planning and Implementation Guide for more details and examples of SMARTIE Goals, short-and long-term data sources that may be used in the “Data Measures” column for support, and other helpful planning aids. Add more tables or lines as needed.
SMARTIE Goals
What specifically are you trying to accomplish? Do your goals meet the criteria of a SMARTIE Goal? Are the evidence-based practices (interventions, activities, or strategies) being used to achieve the SMARTIE Goal?
A SMARTIE Goal is specific, measurable, attainable, realistic, time-bound, inclusive, and equitable and should answer the questions:
- What will be improved?
- By how much?
- By when?
- And, for whom/what?
- How will we know if progress toward the goal is being made?
- When and how often will data be checked for progress?
Questions to ask and answer when addressing inclusion and equity:
- Will achieving this goal build success and/or shrink disparity gaps for specific student groups in our learning community?
- Does the goal ensure that traditionally marginalized students have equitable access, and is there an element of fairness and justice inherent in the goal?
- If the outcome specified in this goal isn’t specifically promoting equity and inclusion, is the process of achieving this goal going to improve equity and inclusion for all students? How?
- Who have we consulted to check for unintended negative consequences? Who needs to be consulted?
- SY 2024–2025 SMARTIE Goal #2: All students will develop a Personal Learning Plan that is connected to High School and Beyond planning and state graduation requirement.
- SY 2024–2025 SMARTIE Goal #2: All students will develop a Personal Learning Plan that is connected to High School and Beyond planning and state graduation requirement.
- SY 2024–2025 SMARTIE Goal #3: All students attending Echo Glen School for 1 semester or more, will accrue credits at the rate of their non- incarcerated peers from 68% of students meeting this goal to 90% of students meeting this goal.